As provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill begin to take effect, colleges and universities are navigating a shifting student lending landscape that is already influencing how students and families cover educational costs. Changes to federal aid programs and borrowing limits are prompting more students to consider private student loans earlier and more frequently than in past years. In this environment, institutions have a heightened responsibility to keep students informed, prepared, and protected. This includes not only proactive programming and workshops, but also timely updates to university websites, financial aid portals, and other student-facing communications so that information about private student lending is presented clearly, transparently, and in context alongside federal aid options.
With students increasingly exploring private loans options, higher education institutions play a critical role in ensuring those decisions are made with a full understanding of the long-term implications. Private student loans can serve as a useful gap-funding tool, but they carry significantly different terms, risks, and borrower responsibilities than federal loans. Thoughtful programming, coordinated communications, and cross-campus collaboration can help students slow down the decision-making process and evaluate their options responsibly.
Here, effective education around private student lending begins with intentional partnerships across campus. Financial aid offices are best positioned to lead this effort, but they should not do so in isolation. Collaborating with financial wellness offices, student support centers, academic advising units, and campus one-stop service centers allows institutions to deliver consistent, reinforced messages. When students encounter the same guidance through workshops, advising conversations, and online resources, they are more likely to absorb key concepts and seek clarification before borrowing.
One of the most important topics institutions can address through programming and communications is underwriting. Unlike federal student loans, which are not credit-based and do not require a traditional credit evaluation, private student loans are approved through a lender’s assessment of creditworthiness. Many students mistakenly assume approval is guaranteed, only to encounter denials, higher interest rates, or delays that can create stress during critical points in the academic term.
Underwriting for private student loans typically centers on several key criteria. Credit score and credit history are foundational elements of the review process. Lenders conduct a hard credit inquiry and often require a minimum credit score in the mid-600s or higher, though standards vary by lender. A strong pattern of on-time payments can be just as important as the score itself.
Typically, income and employment are also evaluated. Borrowers or their cosigners must demonstrate sufficient, stable income to support repayment. Lenders may request documentation such as pay stubs, W-2 forms, or bank statements to verify earnings. This information is used to calculate a debt-to-income ratio, which compares monthly debt obligations to gross monthly income. A lower ratio indicates a greater ability to manage additional debt.
Because many undergraduate students have limited credit histories and little independent income, cosigners play a significant role in private student lending. More than 90 percent of undergraduate private student loans are cosigned. A qualified cosigner can improve approval odds and secure lower interest rates, but this arrangement also places shared legal responsibility for repayment on the cosigner. Institutions should ensure students understand both the short-term benefits and long-term implications for parents, guardians, or others who agree to cosign.
Lenders also verify enrollment and academic eligibility. Borrowers are generally required to be enrolled at least half-time in an eligible degree program at an accredited institution. Some lenders review satisfactory academic progress as part of the underwriting process. Age and citizenship requirements apply as well, with most borrowers needing to be of legal age and a U.S. citizen or permanent resident, although some lenders offer options for international students with a qualified U.S. cosigner.
Helping students understand the private loan process from start to finish can significantly reduce confusion. The process typically begins with an online application submitted by the borrower and cosigner, if applicable. Lenders then verify information and conduct credit checks, often using automated underwriting systems. Approved applicants receive loan offers outlining interest rates, repayment terms, and borrower benefits. Once a student accepts an offer, the loan moves to school certification, where the financial aid office confirms enrollment and cost of attendance. This step can take the longest and often generates questions if expectations are not clearly set. Final approval follows certification, with funds disbursed to the institution near the start of the academic term.
Workshops and presentations that walk students through this lifecycle are particularly effective, especially when scheduled ahead of peak borrowing periods. These sessions should consistently reinforce the importance of exhausting all federal student aid options first by completing the FAFSA. Federal loans offer borrower protections such as fixed interest rates, income-driven repayment plans, deferment options, and forgiveness pathways that private loans do not provide.
Institutions can further support informed borrowing by encouraging comparison shopping. Underwriting criteria, interest rates, repayment options, and borrower benefits vary widely across lenders, including banks, credit unions, and online providers. Students should understand that denial from one lender does not necessarily mean denial from all, and that adding a qualified cosigner is often the most effective way to improve approval outcomes.
Clear, concise written resources are a critical complement to live programming. Updating university websites and financial aid pages to reflect current lending realities is essential, particularly in light of recent policy changes. A private loan fact sheet available through a campus one-stop, financial aid portal, or advising office can reinforce key messages, including the differences between federal and private loans, how underwriting works, the role of cosigners, common reasons for denial, and best practices for borrowing conservatively. Transparent, student-centered language helps reduce misinformation and builds trust.
Ultimately, education around private student loans is not about directing students toward or away from a specific lender or product. It is about ensuring students understand the full scope of their options, responsibilities, and risks before borrowing. Institutions that invest in proactive programming, clear communications, and cross-campus collaboration not only protect their students’ financial futures but also strengthen the integrity of their financial aid operations.
Our goal at HEAG is to support colleges and universities in developing and implementing best practices related to student communications. Institutions seeking guidance on programming, staff training, policy alignment, or student-facing communications are encouraged to contact info@heag.us for support.
Sources include:
